Controversies about OA to music, movies, and other royalty-producing content, therefore, do not carry over to research articles. This results in acute positive reinforcement of the behavior that initiated the flood. Neurobiology of Addiction The scope of this topic was limited to the previous ten years, with primary focus given to articles published in the past five years.
Filtering and censorship barriers.
Certain journals are accused of not carrying out stringent peer review in order to more easily expand their customer base, particularly in journals where authors pay a fee before publication. Material submitted to the OMJ journals must not be discussed with the media, except in the case of accepted contributions, which can be discussed with the media only once published.
The following steps are suggested: Thus, the act of seeking which would include surfing triggers the reward system [ 22 ]. Group research studies and other types of literature reviews, theoretical articles, case studies, etc.
OA eliminates DRM authenticating users, distinguishing authorized from unauthorized users, blocking access to the unauthorized. Journals gave authors the benefit of a fast, public time-stamp on their work. OA increases the visibility of their faculty and research, reduces their expenses for journals, and advances their mission to share knowledge.
The literature review format can vary by disciplineaccording to the purpose for the review, or with different venues for publication. We should not expect OA to make progress in all disciplines at the same rate, any more than we should expect it to make progress in all countries at the same rate.
OA increases the return on their investment in research, making the results of the funded research more widely available, more discoverable, more retrievable, and more useful. The question is not whether scholarly literature can be made costless, but whether there are better ways to pay the bills than by charging readers and creating access barriers.
This would have aligned the DSM-5 with what has, in fact, occurred in the field since its publication, namely, the continued scientific investigation into the broad range of potentially problematic behaviors involving Internet use.
The review leads to the conclusion that Internet pornography addiction fits into the addiction framework and shares similar basic mechanisms with substance addiction.
Currently, although CAM therapies are not the primary treatment of mood disorders, level 1 evidence could emerge in the future showing that such treatments are effective.
OA journals "gold OA": OA makes their articles more visible, discoverable, retrievable, and useful. Some institutions and consortia arrange fee discounts. The majority of studies discussed examined key aspects of addiction involving behaviors through laboratory investigation, including functional neuroimaging studies and structural and resting-state neuroimaging studies.
Future research needs to address whether or not there are specific differences between substance and behavioral addiction. Different criteria will be more or less important depending on your situation or need.
For these reasons there is a growing trend among scholarly authors to retain the right to provide green OA and only transfer the remaining bundle of rights to publishers. Where relevant, we have also discussed neuropsychological studies, which suggest laboratory behavioral parallels with brain studies such as those on structural brain abnormalities thought to be the result of addiction.
In every element of the literature review, it is essential to use correct English grammar and spelling. Is the information supported by evidence?. May 14, · This review of the literature examines evidence-based data on the use of CAM in mood disorders. A search of the PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, and Quertile databases using keywords was conducted, and relevant articles published in the English language in the peer-reviewed journals over the past two decades were retrieved.
A literature review is a written summary of the existing published research on a topic. A literature review can be brief (a section in a larger article) or it can be an entire article unto itself.
The purpose of a literature review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge on a topic, and/or to provide a context for new research. The vast majority of scholarly articles are peer reviewed. However, because there are many different types of peer-review, be sure to evaluate the resource itself.
Counting Method: Only peer-reviewed papers are counted. Supplemental papers are not counted but listed as references in defense of various papers, these are italicized and proceeded by an asterisk (*) so they are not confused with the counted papers. The terms scholarly, academic, peer-reviewed and refereed are sometimes used interchangeably, although there are slight differences.
Scholarly and academic may refer to peer-reviewed articles, but not all scholarly and academic journals are peer-reviewed (although most are.) For example, the Harvard Business Review is an academic journal but it is editorially reviewed, not peer-reviewed.
Scientific literature comprises scholarly publications that report original empirical and theoretical work in the natural and social sciences, and within an academic field, often abbreviated as the literature.
Academic publishing is the process of contributing the results of one's research into the literature, which often requires a peer-review process. Original scientific research published.Literature review peer reviewed articles